OWAIN ap CADWGAN and NEST ferch RHYS - AN HISTORIC FICTION?
By Darrell Wolcott
Most casual students
of Welsh history are familiar with the story of Owain and Nest, where a young nobleman's infatuation for a beautiful
married woman led to his kidnapping the lady to have her for himself. But how much of the tale is actually true?
We should begin
our analysis by identifying the principals involved and placing it within its contemporary environment in the early 12th century.
Cadwgan ap
Bleddyn ap Cynfyn was, in 1109, the oldest of the sons of Bleddyn then alive[1]. As such, he held the "kingship" of
Powys which Bleddyn had ruled until he was killed in 1075. Born c. 1055, he had been too young to succeed his father,
but when the interim Powys king Trahaearn ap Caradog[2] was slain in 1081, the brothers Cadwgan, Madog and Rhiryd ap Bleddyn
appear to have divided Powys among themselves. But in 1088, Madog and Rhiryd were killed when the three brothers attempted
to wrest Deheubarth from Rhys ap Tewdwr. Thus, Cadwgan ap Bleddyn emerged as the head of Bleddyn's family entitled to
rule Powys.
About 1083, Cadwgan
had married Gwenllian ferch Gruffudd ap Cynan[3] ap Idwal (i.e. Gruffudd nephew of Iago); she was the niece of Maredudd ap
Cynan, a man trained as a cleric under Sulien the Wise at Meifod and chosen by Cadwgan as his household priest or offeiriad[4].
She was born in Ireland about 1070 and may have joined her uncle in Powys after her father went missing soon after 1081[5]. The
first child of this marriage was a son named Owain, born c. 1085.
Owain ap Cadwgan
is first mentioned in the Brut in 1106, when he killed two sons of Trahaearn ap Caradog. It is not known if his father
sent him on that mission, but since the slain men were both noblemen of Powys and distant kinfolks we should doubt the young
man acted without Cadwgan's consent. Perhaps those men, Meurig and Gruffudd ap Trahaearn, sought some claim to Powys
as their birthright since Trahaearn had been king before Cadwgan, and it was young Owain earning his spurs as a warrior by
being sent to suppress that threat. But it is the second mention of Owain in 1109 where we find the "love story" about
Nest ferch Rhys ap Tewdwr.
Rhys ap Tewdwr
was a direct descendant of Hywel Dda, and he assumed his birthright as king of Deheubarth in 1079. About 1082,
he married Gwladys ferch Rhiwallon ap Cynfyn[6], a niece of Bleddyn ap Cynfyn and first-cousin of Cadwgan ap Bleddyn.
Among their children was a daughter, Nest, born c. 1085. The following chart shows the relationship of Owain and Nest:
Cadell
965
985 Cynfyn
l
______l_________ Tewdwr Mawr 995
l
l
l
1025 Bleddyn
1024 Rhiwallon Tewdwr 1023
l
l
l
1055 Cadwgan 1060
Gwladys=====Rhys 1051
l
l
1085 Owain
Nest 1085
In 1093, Rhys ap
Tewdwr died on the battlefield in Brycheiniog assisting its king, Bleddyn ap Maenyrch, against the invasion of the Norman marcher
knight Bernard Newmarch. Then a child under 10 years old, Nest was eventually removed from her home by the English
and found herself at the court of King William Rufus as a young lady about 14. There she was seduced by the king's
brother, Henry, soon to be king himself. After bearing a son to Henry I, Nest was later given to the king's man in Dyfed...Gerald
of Windsor...as his wife. Merely a loyal employee of the king and not a landed baron, Gerald was happy
to receive the beautiful girl even though she was not a virgin. In 1108, he built his own castle at Cenarth just across
the Teifi River which separated Dyfed from the lands of Cadwgan ap Bleddyn in Ceredigion, in which he housed his wife and
children.
This brings
us to the year 1109 and the story of Owain and Nest. In the words of one chronicler[7]:
"Cadwgan ap Bleddyn
prepared a royal feast for the leading men of his land (here read Ceredigion). And he invited Owain his son from Powys
to the feast...and when the feast was ended, Owain heard that Nest, daughter of the lord Rhys ap Tewdwr, wife of Gerald the
officer, was in the said castle (Cenarth). And when he heard, he went....to visit her as though she were a kinswoman--and
so she was...And after that, at the instigation of the Devil, he was moved by passion and love for the woman, and with...about
14 men, he made for the castle by night. And unknown to the watchers, he came into the castle over the wall and the
ditch surrounding the building where Gerald and Nest, his wife, were sleeping. And he raised a shout around the building
and set fire to the (other) buildings"
The account continues
with the manner in which Nest helped her husband escape "via the privy hole" and then admitted Owain and his men to her chamber,
telling them Gerald was not there. It continues:
"And then they came
inside and searched for him everywhere. And when they did not find him, they seized Nest and her two sons, and the third son
whom Gerald had by a concubine, and a daughter. And they utterly pillaged the castle and burned it. And he violated
Nest and lay with her and then returned home...And when Cadwgan heard that story, he was grieved and was frightened for two
reasons: because of the violation of the lady, and because of fear of King Henry on account of the injury to his officer....He
sought in every way to restore the woman and the spoil, but he was not allowed. And Owain, because the woman was forever
saying unto him 'if thou wilt have me true and keep me for thyself, release my sons to their father'--and in infatuation for
the woman, he released the two sons and the daughter."
Another version
of the Brut[8] recites much the same story of Owain's raid, but initially says he "had intercourse with her and returned
to his land" omitting any mention of an abduction of Nest or the children. But later, when relating the reaction of
Cadwgan, repeats almost word-for word the story of Owain agreeing to release the children at Nest's request.
The Brenhinedd y Saesson[9]
cites a parallel account of the raid, but ends by saying Owain and his men plundered the castle then seized Nest and the children
and went to Powys with the spoil. There is no mention of sex with Nest.
And in the Welsh
Annals report[10], there is not even a mention of Nest or Gerald being present at their residence when Owain torched it.
We are merely told that Owain ap Cadwgan burnt the castle at Cenarth Bychan and as a result chose to leave home for Ireland:
"Castellum Chenarth Wechan
ab Owino filio Cadugaun combustum est; pro quo facto ipse Owinus ad Hiberniam pulsus rediit"
In her 2007 biography of Princess Nest of Wales[11], the Welsh historian Kari Maund makes this observation about the
Owain story in the Bruts:
"It is an exciting story,
but we should hesitate to take it at full face value. In the first place....this section of the vernacular Welsh Chronicles
shows signs of having been revised or rewritten at some later period to enhance the political standing of the dynasty of Powys....the
account of the abduction of Nest, and the entries for several years on either side, are unusually detailed, including direct
speech, giving them the form almost more of a prose tale than a record of events"
Today, we would call that
an "historical novel", not really meant to be true but what could have happened, and told as if an eyewitness had
been there to tell what he observed and heard. And it was penned by an author who had a motive to both demean Gerald
and enhance the warrior reputation of Owain; he had Gerald escape through his privy hole while the hero of the story bedded
his wife. Seems bad enough to envision a man crawling through feces to escape, but what sort of man would simply run
away and leave his wife to be ravished?
In the Brut entries
for the 2/3 year period following Owain's raid on Castell Cenarth, we find both Owain and his father hiding out in Ireland
to escape the English repercussions. Then Cadwgan is readmitted to the king's favor by paying a fine and promising not
to give Owain any aid nor permit him on his lands. The scribe has Owain returning to Powys hopeful of reconciliation
with Henry I, but unable to find anyone who would agree to intercede for him. Owain next assembles a band of rebels
and conducts looting and burning raids on various Norman manors in Wales, hiding in the mountains whenever being actively
hunted down. Later, he camped on part of his father's lands in Ceredigion to launch raids against the Flemish into Dyfed
and to store the livestock and spoils his band took.
This got his father in
trouble with King Henry, who took Ceredigion away from Cadwgan on the stated grounds "if you can't keep Owain off your lands,
I'll give them to someone who can." Owain again took shelter in Ireland without waiting to see who the king would next
install in Ceredigion. In 1111, Cadwgan was killed by a nephew seeking his realm of Powys; this Madog ap Rhiryd ap Bleddyn
had also killed another uncle, Iorwerth ap Bleddyn, that same year. At this point, we are told that Owain went to the
king and obtained Powys by giving hostages and promising much money. Thus, we are to believe that all of Owain's reputed
transgressions against the king's subjects were forgotten.
In 1114, the chronicler
tells us that Owain was again in trouble, accused of thefts in the lands of Gilbert fitz Richard, the man whom the king had
installed in Ceredigion. Henry I moved an army against the men of Powys and Gwynedd (where it's lord was also accused
of crimes against the king). Maredudd ap Bleddyn, the youngest uncle of Owain, went over to the king's side while Owain
hid out in Snowdonia. But shortly afterwards, Maredudd persuaded his nephew to return to the king's peace. According
to the Brut author, the king received Owain joyfully, did him honor and praised him. And raised him highest among his
kin, took him on a royal trip to Normandy and made him a knight.
One must now ask
how much of this is history and how much is mere aggrandization of the Powys dynasty. The chronicles for these years
still read like a novel, including many direct quotations. The truth might well be surrounded with much fiction about
Owain's activities from 1109 to 1114.
We would see him
as a Welsh nationalist, intent upon expelling the Normans from his homeland. But a man receiving little or no support
from his father; Cadwgan was then in his 50's and his passion for challenging Henry I had ebbed. Suppose we posit that
Owain, together with a few of his cousins, were not bandits and thieves at all but operating as a roving warband against the
Norman men which had been installed in Wales. Not numerous nor strong enough to meet the Normans in pitched battle,
they merely engaged in a hit-and-run campaign chosing sparsely defended targets. Whenever the English mounted serious
campaigns to find him, Owain slipped away to Ireland until the organized efforts to locate him ceased.
For his part, Henry may
have viewed him as a rebel but not as a thief or abductor of women. Merely as a proud man whose birthright had been
stolen by Henry's men and didn't intend to accept that fate willingly. Thus, when Owain finally elected to come to the king's
peace, he was treated as a man of noble birth who had honorably fought to regain what had been his own lands.
Nothing told about the
activities of Owain following his 1109 raid on Gerald's castle at Cenarth Bychan is compatable with his having Nest, or any
woman or small children, in tow. He was a warrior without a safe home in which to house a family, constantly on the
move to strike his targets of choice and then find a place to hide until the dust settled. It would have been difficult
for him to secure safe lodging with most of his elders as they feared losing their lands to the king if they sheltered his
little warband.
It must be left
an open question, then, whether or not Owain ever had a love affair with Nest. Certainly if he had abducted her at all,
he had little means to keep her with him for any length of time. We do know that she had at least one more child by her
husband Gerald after 1109 and that after his death, married in succession two other Norman officers.
As for Owain, he was reportedly killed in 1116, while on a military mission for King Henry, by a band of Flemish men led by
Gerald of Windsor. Thus, the chronicler would have us believe that the same man Owain offended in 1109 was the eventual instrument
of his death. One might suspect this report was a dramatic way to end the whole Owain/Nest saga which had been related
in words more akin to the novelist than the historian.